Next: Facilities
and Instrumentation: How Up: The
Nuclear Response to Previous: Onset
of Chaos in
Giant Modes in Cold and Hot Nuclei
Since their discovery giant resonances have attracted much attention because
of their fundamental nature. They provide insight into both the effective
nucleon-nucleon interaction and other basic properties of nuclei, such
as shape and compressibility. The giant monopole resonance (GMR) represents
a compression oscillation, providing information about the compression
modulus of infinite nuclear matter. While in heavy nuclei with A>100
the GMR has been consistently found with its full energy-weighted sum rule
(EWSR), only a part of the EWSR could be identified in light-mass nuclei,
probably due to the fragmentation of the resonance strength. If this turns
out to be generally true, it will imply a much higher centroid energy for
this resonance than expected both on the basis of extrapolations from the
A>100 region and of the predictions of calculations with effective
interactions and with coupling to the continuum and to doorway states taken
into account. These questions form a very lively experimental programme.
The isovector giant dipole resonance (GDR) can be excited in small angle
inelastic scattering of isoscalar probes, e.g. 200 MeV
-particles,
via both the Coulomb and the nuclear interactions. The nuclear excitation
matrix element is proportional to the neutron skin thickness, which occurs
because of the different density distributions of protons and neutrons.
In inverse kinematics, this offers a novel method of measuring the neutron
skin thickness of unstable nuclei. Giant resonances represent collective
oscillations of all the nucleons in a nucleus. Such oscillations occur
also in spin-isospin space, where protons and neutrons with spin-up and
spin-down may move out of phase
=1,
=1.
We are dealing with spin-isospin excitations, which are governed by the
spin-isospin dependent part of the nucleon-nucleon (N-N) interaction in
the nuclear medium. The Gamov-Teller resonance (GT,
=0)
has been well established in charge-exchange reactions. However, the mechanism
responsible for the depletion of its strength has not been resolved satisfactorily
as yet. Much less is known about the spin-flip
= 1 (SDR) and higher
resonances. The use of polarised beams can be of great help in sorting
out information on the different SDR excitations, as well as for the identification
and delineation of the isovector M1 and
=1
spin-flip modes in sd- and light fp-shell nuclei, which play a central
role in the astrophysics context. The study of the microscopic structure
of a giant resonance requires measurements of nuclear decay to final hole
states since it is a coherent superposition of 1p-1h states. Such studies
will benefit greatly from the new accelerators at Groningen and Catania
and from a range of new neutron and charged particle detection systems.
Giant Resonances can be understood as first oscillator quanta of the collective
vibration. The recent discovery of the double GDR and GQR, the second oscillator
quanta, has strengthened this picture, see figure
.
Rather different reaction mechanisms have been used to study multiphonon
excitations: pion double-charge exchange, relativistic heavy-ion Coulomb
scattering and medium-energy heavy-ion inelastic scattering. The existing
data indicate that, to first order, these multiphonons can be thought of
as consisting of independent phonons, although in several experiments the
excitation cross section is about twice that implied by the independent
phonon picture. If verified, this may point to small anharmonicities in
the two-phonon structure or small non-linearities in the excitation process.
A better theoretical understanding of the width and decay of the double
GDR is still needed.
Figure: Comparison of various experimental quantities X
for the two-phonon giant dipole resonance in 208Pb with those
obtained in the harmonic limit Xharm. Results are shown
for the resonance energy E0, width
,
integrated cross section
(averaged over all targets), decay branching ratio T2g/Tn
and neutron decay probability Tn. In all cases, the harmonic
values Xharm are obtained using the known values of the
single GDR.
 |
When the N/Z ratio differs appreciably from that in stable
nuclei one expects exotic collective modes of excitation. This will be
a very active area of research at the new radioactive beam facilities.
Giant resonances can be built on any nuclear state. The study of their
decay provides information on nuclear structure at very high temperature
and angular momentum. So far only the GDR built on excited states has been
studied; its characteristic
-decay
has been measured and the strength function extracted for many different
reactions. This has provided information on how the nuclear shape evolves
with temperature and angular momentum. A consistent picture emerges with
a constant collisional damping width up to about 2 MeV per nucleon in excitation
and a gradual weakening of the GDR strength above 3 MeV per nucleon. The
explanation requires more refined measurements. In fusion-fission reactions
the total
-yield
from the initial state to the scission point is a measure of the relative
partial decay widths,
.
Since
-decay
is mediated through the GDR, it can be used as an accurate clock to obtain
the time evolution of the fission process. As for neutrons and charged
particles, these studies have recently shown that the yield of pre-scission
-rays
is larger than expected on the basis of the Bohr-Wheeler description of
the fission partial decay width, and could be explained by delaying the
fission process through an increase in the viscosity of the nucleus. Evidence
for a sharp onset of the nuclear viscosity as a function of the excitation
energy has been reported for Th and Cf nuclei. A satisfactory theory is
still lacking. Furthermore, on the theoretical side, it is worthwhile remembering
that isospin restoration in highly excited compound nuclei, predicted over
30 years ago, and found in recent dedicated experiments, still lacks a
quantitative description.
Next: Facilities
and Instrumentation: How Up: The
Nuclear Response to Previous: Onset
of Chaos in
NuPECC WebForce,
2007-09-09